Frequent Questions

Watershed Partners
  Nat'l Watershed Network
  State Contacts


What's a...
  Watershed 
  Watershed Address
  Watershed Partnership
  Water Glossary

Watershed Guides
  Building Local Partnerships
  Getting to Know Your
Watershed
  Leading & Communicating
  Managing Conflict
  Putting Together a
Watershed Plan
  Reflecting on Lakes
  Wetlands: A Key Link in
Watershed Management
  Groundwater & Surface
Water: Understanding the
Interaction 

Other Resources
  Watershed Quiz
 
Conference Calendar
  eLeader Newsletters
 
TMDL Resources

Know Your Watershed is coordinated by Conservation Technology Information Center.

Current Monitoring


Stream Quality Assessments / Macroinvertebrate Sampling
A simple approach to monitoring stream quality is to collect and analyze key indicator species of aquatic insects and other life forms that make the stream their home. Macroinvertebrate monitoring is a low cost, uncomplicated means of developing a general picture of stream health.

Macroinvertebrates are organisms lacking a backbone and are visible to the naked eye. In freshwater streams, they include the aquatic insects, crayfish, clams and mussels, snails, worms and others. In most streams and rivers the larval insects dominate the macroinvertebrate community. These organisms provide an excellent tool for stream quality assessment.

Macroinvertebrates, being rather restricted to their immediate habitat, cannot escape changes in water quality. If a mild to severe pollution problem impacts the creek, a considerable period of time may be required for the macroinvertebrates to fully recover former community structure. These organisms can provide a relative view of the overall quality of a stream at any given time.

The vast majority of stream dwelling macroinvertebrates live in riffle areas. The constant flow of water that riffle areas provide offer a continuous and plentiful supply of food in the form of plant and animal matter.

Macroinvertebrate monitoring has been recognized as a front line indicator of stream health. By using this easy sampling system, the watershed project is working to develop a record of data to be used for tracking water quality trends in the future. The sampling gives the project current assessment of the stream water quality, which can lead to faster identification of problems.

Results
The preliminary indications of the data collected reveals the water quality rates between "fair" and "good" using the rating system developed by ODNR. Two years of monitoring is not enough to draw conclusions of the water quality of the watershed tributaries. The monitoring does allow for the development of baseline data to be used for comparisons and for developing trends. The table below reveals the cumulative macroinvertebrate monitoring results and monitoring locations.

Cumulative Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Results *

Stream Location1994
Index Value
1994 Stream Quality Assessment1995
Index Value
1995 Stream Quality Assessment
Black Hawk Run, downstream of sediment trap8Poor11Fair
Black Hawk Run,
upstream of sediment trap
1Poor14Fair
Van Horn Creek,
State Route 366 bridge
9Poor11Fair
North Fork,
Township Road 190
5Poor10Fair
North Fork, downstream of County Road 65 bridge20Good11Fair
South Fork, County Road 38 upstream from covered bridge22Good13Fair
South Fork, State Route 638 upstream from bridge18Good18Good
South Fork-Red Slough Ditch, upstream from County Road 103 bridge, open ditchN/AN/A7Poor
South Fork-Red slough Ditch, downstream from Co. Rd. 103 bridge, shaded ditchN/AN/A16Fair
* Index value and stream quality assessment indicators were derived using ODNR's macroinbertebrate sampling guidelines.



To Top